dimanche, mars 11, 2007

Fuel Economy

My brother and his wife just bought an SUV, surprised that my brother was "one of them" (I'm convinced that his drive to work doesn't have too much 'off-roading'), I looked up some stuff on fuel efficiency. Some interesting facts:

  1. The average fuel efficiency of European cars is over 40 mpg (5.9 L/100 km), Japanese cars 45 mpg (5.2 L/100 km), and North American cars 20.4 mpg (11.5 L/100 km)[1].
  2. "The EPA tests used through 2007 do not directly measure fuel consumption, but rather calculate the amount of fuel used by measuring emissions from the tailpipe based on a formula created in 1972.
    ...
    As emissions standards have become more strict due to smog, most of the resulting numbers do not directly correspond to what people actually experience when driving. Most often, the EPA estimate of mileage is several percent higher than what the average driver manages to achieve in practice, although there are some cases where the difference is nearly 200% higher than what the average driver achieves.
    ...
    The old test* method was particularly favorable to hybrid cars, as the driving style used utilizes far more electric-only power than most drivers will use in day-to-day driving. As such, these vehicles will see the largest decrease in fuel economy ratings - city economy is expected to drop by 20 to 30 percent, and highway economy by 10 to 20 percent."[2]
  3. "Most of these previously-cited fuel economy values are for operation on petrol, gasoline. New US light vehicles designated as flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs) running on E85 (85% ethanol, 15% gasoline) will typically achieve from 5% to 15% less fuel economy in mpg on pure E85 than when operated on pure gasoline. Older non-turbo-charged fuel-injected FFVs running on E85 will typically achieve about 25% to 30% less fuel economy on E85. Over 4 million FFVs are currently operated on US roadways as of 2005; most tend to be light trucks or van vehicles, although newer "car-shaped" high performance autos are also being introduced in the 2006 model year (e.g., 2006 GM Chevrolet Impala)."[2]
  4. "Engine shut-off becomes efficient during stops exceeding 3 seconds since fuel consumed during start is less than that consumed during 3 seconds of idle. Some manufacturers have begun developing cars that shut off the engine when not in use and automatically restart it when the brake pedal is released. Engine wear during restart is considered to be negligible."[2]
  • * Due to concerns over the accuracy of this method, a new test was proposed and approved in 2006 for use beginning with model year 2008 vehicles" [4]

To finished up, here are some fuel energy contents

Fuel type MJ/L MJ/kg BTU/imp gal BTU/US gal Research octane
number (RON)
Regular Gasoline 31.60 42.70 151,600 126,200 Min 91
Premium Gasoline 32.84 43.50 157,500 131,200 Min 95
Autogas (LPG) (60% Propane + 40% Butane) 24.85 46.02 119,200 99,300 115
Ethanol 21.17 26.80 101,600 84,600 129
Methanol 15.56 19.70 74,600 62,200 123
Gasohol (10% ethanol + 90% gasoline) 30.63 41.11 146,900 122,300 93/94
Diesel 35.50 42.50 170,200 141,700 N/A (see cetane)
[2]

Note: The above energy values are higher heating values. For calculating actual vehicle fuel economy the lower heating value is used. The lower heating values are around 90% of the energy defined above. [3]


References

  1. Robert Rapier, Wednesday, April 19, 2006, Fuel Efficiency and Lessons from Europe
    http://i-r-squared.blogspot.com/2006/04/fuel-efficiency-and-lessons-from.html
  2. Wikipedia, Fuel economy in automobiles, 14:52, 9 March 2007 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_economy
  3. Automotive Handbook, 4th Edition, Robert Bosch GmbH, 1996. ISBN 978-0-8376-0333-9
  4. EPA420-F-06-069, December 2006, Regulatory Announcement: EPA Issues New Test Methods for Fuel Economy Window Stickers
    http://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy/420f06069.htm

Libellés :

3 Comments:

At dimanche, mars 11, 2007 11:56:00 p.m., Anonymous Anonyme said...

You are making a good case here - but your fuel numbers ie: Btu's per gallon are WAYYYYY off. For instance, you cite regular gasoline as having 126,200 Btu's per gallon. In measured practice in taking gasoline samples off the street to specific test labs - I've found that most regular gasoline is about 112,000 Btu's and it should be 115,000 Btu's per gallon. Not 126.2k Btu's.

Next, you cite ethanol as having 84,600 Btu's per gallon. If you google all around, you'll find that ethanol is listed as having from 73,000 to 83,000 Btu's per gallon. The auto experts agree, it features 75,560 Btu's per gallon.

Next, single-carbon methanol is listed on your published chart as having 62,200 Btu's per gallon. In reality, methanol features only 49,900 Btu's and more commonly is referred to as 50,000 Btu's.

I don't know where you got your data which is being listed - but it is way off the mark here sir...

 
At lundi, mars 12, 2007 12:00:00 a.m., Blogger Matt said...

heh, that's embarrassing, I trusted Wikipedia. I'll look up these numbers at other sources to verify them then update the posting.

Thanks.

 
At mardi, mars 20, 2007 12:16:00 p.m., Blogger Matt said...

Hmm, numbers for these are difficult to find. The original numbers were taken from Wikipedia, and they're reference was "Automotive Handbook, 4th Edition, Robert Bosch GmbH, 1996. ISBN 978-0-8376-0333-9." That reference seems to online exist online in one place, and very poorly formatted at that.

As for the numbers, for Gasolean, HowStuffWorks.com lists the BTU's per gallon at 125K ( http://science.howstuffworks.com/gasoline1.htm )

For Ethanol, the Energy Information Administration Ethanol Analyses site ( http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ethanol3.html ) states that the energy density of ethanol is 83,333 BTUs/Gal.

I have not found a second source for single-carbon methanol.

These numbers are surely for lab grade fuels, and perhaps not necessarily completely representative of what you'd find at the pump.

Anyways, I could not find any sources that backed up your numbers, do you have any source on them?

 

Publier un commentaire

<< Home